View Source Multi tenancy with query prefixes

With Ecto we can run queries in different prefixes using a single pool of database connections. For databases engines such as Postgres, Ecto's prefix maps to Postgres' DDL schemas. For MySQL, each prefix is a different database on its own.

Multi-tenancy and migrations

When working with multi-tenant databases, you need to apply database migrations (such as adding/removing tables, columns, and indexes) to each tenant. If your application grows to dozens of thousands of tenants or more, those migrations can eventually become too expensive and take a long time to complete.

Query prefixes may be useful in different scenarios. For example, multi tenant apps running on PostgreSQL would define multiple prefixes, usually one per client, under a single database. The idea is that prefixes will provide data isolation between the different users of the application, guaranteeing either globally or at the data level that queries and commands act on a specific tenants.

Prefixes may also be useful on high-traffic applications where data is partitioned upfront. For example, a gaming platform may break game data into isolated partitions, each named after a different prefix. A partition for a given player is either chosen at random or calculated based on the player information.

Given each tenant has its own database structure, multi tenancy with query prefixes is expensive to setup. For example, migrations have to run individually for each prefix. Therefore this approach is useful when there is a limited or a slowly growing number of tenants.

Let's get started. Note all the examples below assume you are using PostgreSQL. Other databases engines may require slightly different solutions.

Connection prefixes

As a starting point, let's start with a simple scenario: your application must connect to a particular prefix when running in production. This may be due to infrastructure conditions, database administration rules or others.

Let's define a repository and a schema to get started:

# lib/repo.ex
defmodule MyApp.Repo do
  use Ecto.Repo,
    otp_app: :my_app,
    adapter: Ecto.Adapters.Postgres
end

# lib/sample.ex
defmodule MyApp.Sample do
  use Ecto.Schema

  schema "samples" do
    field :name
    timestamps
  end
end

Now let's configure the repository:

# config/config.exs
config :my_app, MyApp.Repo,
  username: "postgres",
  password: "postgres",
  database: "demo",
  hostname: "localhost",
  pool_size: 10

And define a migration:

# priv/repo/migrations/20160101000000_create_sample.exs
defmodule MyApp.Repo.Migrations.CreateSample do
  use Ecto.Migration

  def change do
    create table(:samples) do
      add :name, :string
      timestamps()
    end
  end
end

Now let's create the database, migrate it and then start an IEx session:

$ mix ecto.create
$ mix ecto.migrate
$ iex -S mix
Interactive Elixir - press Ctrl+C to exit
iex(1)> MyApp.Repo.all MyApp.Sample
[]

We haven't done anything unusual so far. We created our database instance, made it up to date by running migrations and then successfully made a query against the "samples" table, which returned an empty list.

By default, connections to Postgres' databases run on the "public" prefix. When we run migrations and queries, they are all running against the "public" prefix. However imagine your application has a requirement to run on a particular prefix in production, let's call it "connection_prefix".

Luckily Postgres allows us to change the prefix our database connections run on by setting the "schema search path". The best moment to change the search path is right after we setup the database connection, ensuring all of our queries will run on that particular prefix, throughout the connection life-cycle.

To do so, let's change our database configuration in "config/config.exs" and specify an :after_connect option. :after_connect expects a tuple with module, function and arguments it will invoke with the connection process, as soon as a database connection is established:

query_args = ["SET search_path TO connection_prefix", []]

config :my_app, MyApp.Repo,
  username: "postgres",
  password: "postgres",
  database: "demo_dev",
  hostname: "localhost",
  pool_size: 10,
  after_connect: {Postgrex, :query!, query_args}

Now let's try to run the same query as before:

$ iex -S mix
Interactive Elixir - press Ctrl+C to exit
iex(1)> MyApp.Repo.all MyApp.Sample
** (Postgrex.Error) ERROR (undefined_table):
   relation "samples" does not exist

Our previously successful query now fails because there is no table "samples" under the new prefix. Let's try to fix that by running migrations:

$ mix ecto.migrate
** (Postgrex.Error) ERROR (invalid_schema_name):
   no schema has been selected to create in

Oops. Now migration says there is no such schema name. That's because Postgres automatically creates the "public" prefix every time we create a new database. If we want to use a different prefix, we must explicitly create it on the database we are running on:

$ psql -d demo_dev -c "CREATE SCHEMA connection_prefix"

Now we are ready to migrate and run our queries:

$ mix ecto.migrate
$ iex -S mix
Interactive Elixir - press Ctrl+C to exit
iex(1)> MyApp.Repo.all MyApp.Sample
[]

Data in different prefixes are isolated. Writing to the "samples" table in one prefix cannot be accessed by the other unless we change the prefix in the connection or use the Ecto conveniences we will discuss next.

Schema prefixes

Ecto also allows you to set a particular schema to run on a specific prefix. Imagine you are building a multi-tenant application. Each client data belongs to a particular prefix, such as "client_foo", "client_bar" and so forth. Yet your application may still rely on a set of tables that are shared across all clients. One of such tables may be exactly the table that maps the Client ID to its database prefix. Let's assume we want to store this data in a prefix named "main":

defmodule MyApp.Mapping do
  use Ecto.Schema

  @schema_prefix "main"
  schema "mappings" do
    field :client_id, :integer
    field :db_prefix
    timestamps
  end
end

Now running MyApp.Repo.all MyApp.Mapping will by default run on the "main" prefix, regardless of the value configured for the connection on the :after_connect callback. However, we may want to override the schema prefix too and Ecto gives us the opportunity to do so, let's see how.

Per-query and per-struct prefixes

Now, suppose that while still configured to connect to the "connection_prefix" on :after_connect, we run the following queries:

iex(1)> alias MyApp.Sample
MyApp.Sample
iex(2)> MyApp.Repo.all(Sample)
[]
iex(3)> MyApp.Repo.insert(%Sample{name: "mary"})
{:ok, %MyApp.Sample{...}}
iex(4)> MyApp.Repo.all(Sample)
[%MyApp.Sample{...}]

The operations above ran on the "connection_prefix". So what happens if we try to run the sample query on the "public" prefix? All Ecto repository operations support the :prefix option. So let's set it to public.

iex(7)> MyApp.Repo.all(Sample)
[%MyApp.Sample{...}]
iex(8)> MyApp.Repo.all(Sample, prefix: "public")
[]

Notice how we were able to change the prefix the query runs on. Back in the default "public" prefix, there is no data.

One interesting aspect of prefixes in Ecto is that the prefix information is carried along each struct returned by a query:

iex(9)> [sample] = MyApp.Repo.all(Sample)
[%MyApp.Sample{}]
iex(10)> Ecto.get_meta(sample, :prefix)
nil

The example above returned nil, which means no prefix was specified by Ecto, and therefore the database connection default will be used. In this case, "connection_prefix" will be used because of the :after_connect callback we added at the beginning of this guide.

Since the prefix data is carried in the struct, we can use such to copy data from one prefix to the other. Let's copy the sample above from the "connection_prefix" to the "public" one:

iex(11)> new_sample = Ecto.put_meta(sample, prefix: "public")
%MyApp.Sample{}
iex(12)> MyApp.Repo.insert(new_sample)
{:ok, %MyApp.Sample{}}
iex(13)> [sample] = MyApp.Repo.all(Sample, prefix: "public")
[%MyApp.Sample{}]
iex(14)> Ecto.get_meta(sample, :prefix)
"public"

Now we have data inserted in both prefixes. Note how we passed the :prefix option to MyApp.Repo.all. Almost all Repo operations accept :prefix as an option, with one important distinction:

  • the :prefix option in query operations (all/2, update_all/2, and delete_all/2) is a fallback. It will only be used when a @schema_prefix or a query prefix was not previously specified

  • the :prefix option in schema operations (insert_all/3, insert/2, update/2, etc) will override the @schema_prefix as well as any prefix in the struct/changeset

This difference in behaviour is by design: we want to allow flexibility when writing queries but we want to enforce struct/changeset operations to always work isolated within a given prefix. In fact, if call MyApp.Repo.insert(post) or MyApp.Repo.update(post), and the post includes associations, the associated data will also be inserted/updated in the same prefix as post.

Per from/join prefixes

Finally, Ecto allows you to set the prefix individually for each from and join expression. Here's an example:

from p in Post, prefix: "foo",
  join: c in Comment, prefix: "bar"

Those will take precedence over all other prefixes we have defined so far. For each join/from in the query, the prefix used will be determined by the following order:

  1. If the prefix option is given exclusively to join/from
  2. If the @schema_prefix is set in the related schema
  3. If the :prefix field given to the repo operation (i.e. Repo.all(query, prefix: prefix))
  4. The connection prefix

Migration prefixes

When the connection prefix is set, it also changes the prefix migrations run on. However it is also possible to set the prefix through the command line or per table in the migration itself.

For example, imagine you are a gaming company where the game is broken in 128 partitions, named "prefix_1", "prefix_2", "prefix_3" up to "prefix_128". Now, whenever you need to migrate data, you need to migrate data on all different 128 prefixes. There are two ways of achieve that.

The first mechanism is to invoke mix ecto.migrate multiple times, once per prefix, passing the --prefix option:

$ mix ecto.migrate --prefix "prefix_1"
$ mix ecto.migrate --prefix "prefix_2"
$ mix ecto.migrate --prefix "prefix_3"
...
$ mix ecto.migrate --prefix "prefix_128"

The other approach is by changing each desired migration to run across multiple prefixes. For example:

defmodule MyApp.Repo.Migrations.CreateSample do
  use Ecto.Migration

  def change do
    for i <- 1..128 do
      prefix = "prefix_#{i}"
      create table(:samples, prefix: prefix) do
        add :name, :string
        timestamps()
      end

      # Execute the commands on the current prefix
      # before moving on to the next prefix
      flush()
    end
  end
end

Summing up

Ecto provides many conveniences for working with querying prefixes. Those conveniences allow developers to configure prefixes with different precedence, starting with the highest one. When executing queries with all, update_all or delete_all, the prefix is computed as follows:

  1. from/join prefixes
  2. schema prefixes
  3. the :prefix option
  4. connection prefixes

When working with schemas and changesets in insert_all, insert, update, and so forth, the precedence is:

  1. the :prefix option
  2. changeset prefixes
  3. schema prefixes
  4. connection prefixes

This way developers can tackle different scenarios from production requirements to multi-tenant applications.