ash
ash v2.11.8

View Source Errors

There is a difficult balance to cut between informative errors and enabling simple reactions to those errors. Since many extensions may need to work with and/or adapt their behavior based on errors coming from Ash, we need rich error messages. However, when you have a hundred different exceptions to represent the various kinds of errors a system can produce, it becomes difficult to say something like "try this code, and if it is invalid, do x, if it is forbidden, do y. To this effect, exceptions in Ash have one of four classes mapping to the top level exceptions.

error-classes

 Error Classes

Since many actions can be happening at once, we want to support the presence of multiple errors as a result of a request to Ash. We do this by grouping up the errors into one before returning or raising. We choose an exception based on the order of the exceptions listed above. If there is a single forbidden, we choose Ash.Error.Forbidden, if there is a single invalid, we choose Ash.Error.Invalid and so on. The actual errors will be included in the errors key on the exception. The exception's message will contain a bulleted list of all the underlying exceptions that occurred. This makes it easy to react to specific kinds of errors, as well as to react to any/all of the errors present.

An example of a single error being raised, representing multiple underlying errors:

AshExample.Representative
|> Ash.Changeset.new(%{employee_id: "the best"})
|> AshExample.Api.create!()
 ** (Ash.Error.Invalid) Input Invalid
 * employee_id: must be absent.
 * first_name, last_name: at least 1 must be present.
    (ash 1.3.0) lib/ash/api/api.ex:534: Ash.Api.unwrap_or_raise!/1

This allows easy rescuing of the major error classes, as well as inspection of the underlying cases

try do
  AshExample.Representative
  |> Ash.Changeset.new(%{employee_id: "dabes"})
  |> AshExample.Api.create!()
rescue
  e in Ash.Error.Invalid ->
    "Encountered #{Enum.count(e.errors)} errors"
end

"Encountered 2 errors"

This pattern does add some additional overhead when you want to rescue specific kinds of errors. For example, you may need to do something like this:

try do
  AshExample.Representative
  |> Ash.Changeset.new(%{employee_id: "dabes"})
  |> AshExample.Api.create!()
rescue
  e in Ash.Error.Invalid ->
    case Enum.find(e.errors, &(&1.__struct__ == A.Specific.Error)) do
      nil ->
        ...handle errors
      error ->
        ...handle specific error you found
    end
end