View Source Expressions
Ash expressions are used in various places like calculations, filters, and policies, and are meant to be portable representations of elixir expressions. You can create an expression using the Ash.Query.expr/1
macro, like so:
Ash.Query.expr(1 + 2)
Ash.Query.expr(x + y)
Ash.Query.expr(post.title <> " | " <> post.subtitle)
Ash expressions have some interesting properties in their evaluation, primarily because they are made to be portable, i.e executable in some data layer (like SQL) or executable in Elixir. In general, these expressions will behave the same way they do in Elixir. The primary difference is how nil
values work. They behave the way that NULL
values behave in SQL. This is primarily because this pattern is easier to replicate to various popular data layers, and is generally safer when using expressions for things like authentication. The practical implications of this are that nil
values will "poison" many expressions, and cause them to return nil
. For example, x + nil
would always evaluate to nil
.
operators
Operators
The following operators are available and they behave the same as they do in Elixir, except for the nil
addendum above.
==
!=
>
>=
<
<=
in
*
-
/
<>
||
&&
is_nil
| Custom, accepts a boolean on the right side i.ex is_nil true
orx is_nil false
.
functions
Functions
The following functions are built in. Data Layers can add their own functions to expressions. For example, AshPostgres
adds a fragment
function that allows you to provide SQL directly.
The following functions are built in:
if
| Works like elixir'sif
.is_nil/1
| Works like elixir'sis_nil
get_path/2
| i.eget_path(value, ["foo", "bar"])
. This is what expressions likevalue[:foo]["bar"]
are turned into under the hood.contains/2
| if one string contains another string, i.econtains("fred", "red")
length/1
| the length of a list, i.e.length([:foo, :bar])
type/2
| Cast a given value to a specific type, i.etype(^arg(:id), :uuid)
ortype(integer_field, :string)
string_join/1
| Concatenates a list of strings, and ignores any nil valuesstring_join/2
| As above, but with a joiner
sub-expressions
Sub-expressions
exists/2
|exists(foo.bar, name == "fred")
takes an expression scoped to the destination resource, and checks if any related entry matches. See the section onexists
below.path.exists/2
| Same asexists
but the source of the relationship is itself a nested relationship. See the section onexists
below.parent/1
| Allows an expression scoped to a resource to refer to the "outer" context.
datetime-functions
DateTime Functions
now/0
| Evaluates to the current time when the expression is evaluatedtoday/0
| Evaluates to the current date when the expression is evaluatedago/2
| i.edeleted_at > ago(7, :day)
. The available time intervals are documented inAsh.Type.DurationName
from_now/2
| Same asago
but adds instead of subtractingdatetime_add/3
| add an interval to a datetime, i.edatetime_add(^datetime, 10, :hour)
date/3
| add an interval to a date, i.edatetime_add(^date, 3, :day)
primitives
Primitives
cond
-cond
is transformed to a series ofif
expressions under the hooditem[:key] or item["key"]
- accesses keys in a map. In both cases, it prefers a matching atom key, falling back to a matching string key. This is to aid with data stores that store embeds as JSON with string keys (like AshPostgres), so that this expression behaves the same in the data layer as it does in Elixir.
templates
Templates
Most of the time, when you are using an expression, you will actually be creating a template
. In this template, you have a few references that can be used, which will be replaced when before the expression is evaluated. The following references are available. The ones that start with ^
must be imported from Ash.Filter.TemplateHelpers
.
^actor(:key) # equivalent to `get_in(actor || %{}, [:key])`
^actor([:key1, :key2]) # equivalent to `get_in(actor || %{}, [:key, :key2])`
^arg(:arg_name) # equivalent to `Map.get(arguments, :arg_name)`
^context(:key) # equivalent to `get_in(context, :key)`
^context([:key1, :key2]) # equivalent to `get_in(context, [:key1, :key2])`
ref(:key) # equivalent to referring to `key`. Allows for dynamic references
ref(:key, [:path]) # equivalent to referring to `path.key`. Allows for dynamic references with dynamic (or static) paths.
use-cases-for-expressions
Use cases for expressions
filters
Filters
The most obvious place we use expressions is when filtering data. For example:
Ash.Query.filter(Ticket, status == :open and opened_at >= ago(10, :day))
These filters will be run in the data layer, i.e in the SQL query.
Filter semantics & joins
The semantics of Ash filters are probably slightly different than what you are used to, and they are important to understand. Every filter expression is always talking about a single row, potentially "joined" to single related rows. By referencing relationships, you are implicitly doing a join. For those familiar with SQL terminology, it is equivalent to a left join, although AshPostgres can detect when it is safe to do an inner join (for performance reason). Lets use an example of posts
and comments
.
Given a filter like the following:
Ash.Query.filter(Post, comments.points > 10 and comments.tag.name == "elixir")
The filter refers to a single post/comment/tag combination. So in english, this is "posts where they have a comment with more than 10 points and that same comment has a tag with the name elixir
". What this also means is that filters like the above do not compose nicely when new filters are added. For example:
def has_comment_with_more_points_than(query, score) do
Ash.Query.filter(Post, comments.points > 10)
end
def has_comment_tagged(query, tag) do
Ash.Query.filter(Post, comments.tag.name == ^tag)
end
Post
|> has_comment_with_more_points_than(query, 10)
|> has_comment_tagged("elixir")
That code seems like it ought to produce a filter over Post
that would give us any post with a comment having more than 10 points, and with a comment tagged elixir
. That is not the same thing as having a single comment that meets both those criteria. So how do we make this better?
Exists
Lets rewrite the above using exists:
def has_comment_with_more_points_than(query, score) do
Ash.Query.filter(Post, exists(comments, points > 10))
end
def has_comment_tagged(query, tag) do
Ash.Query.filter(Post, exists(comments.tag.name == ^tag)
end
Post
|> has_comment_with_more_points_than(query, 10)
|> has_comment_tagged("elixir")
Now, they will compose properly! Generally speaking, you should use exists when you are filtering across any relationships that are to_many
relationships *even if you don't expect your filter to be composed. Currently, the filter syntax does not minimize(combine) these exists/2
statements, but doing so is not complex and can be added. While unlikely, please lodge an issue if you see any performance issues with exists
.
Exists at path
Sometimes, you want the ability to say that some given row must have an existing related entry matching a filter. For example:
Ash.Query.filter(Post, author.exists(roles, name == :admin) and author.active)
While the above is not common, it can be useful in some specific circumstances, and is used under the hood by the policy authorizer when combining the filters of various resources to create a single filter.
portability
Portability
Ash expressions being portable is more important than it sounds. For example, if you were using AshPostgres and had the following calculation, which is an expression capable of being run in elixir or translated to SQL:
calculate :full_name, :string, expr(first_name <> " " <> last_name)
And you did something like the following:
User
|> Ash.Query.load(:full_name)
|> Ash.Query.sort(:full_name)
|> Accounts.read!()
You would see that it ran a SQL query with the full_name
calculation as SQL. This allows for sorting on that value. However, if you had something like this:
# data can be loaded in the query like above, or on demand later
Accounts.load!(user, :full_name)
you would see that no SQL queries are run. The calculation is run directly in Elixir and the value is set.
parent
Parent
Parent
is a way to "jump out" of a scoped expression. Here are some examples:
Ash.Query.filter(exists(open_tickets, severity >= parent(severity_threshold)))
coming-soon
COMING SOON
The following two examples do not work currently, but are being worked on
has_many :relevant_tickets, Ticket **do**
filter expr(status == :open and severity >= parent(severity_threshold))
end
count :count_of_relevant_tickets, :open_tickets do
filter expr(status == :open and severity >= parent(severity_threshold))
end
referencing-related-values
Referencing related values
Related values can be references using dot delimiters, i.e Ash.Query.filter(user.first_name == "fred")
.
When referencing related values in filters, if the reference is a has_one
or belongs_to
, the filter does exactly what it looks like (matches if the related value matches). If it is a has_many
or a many_to_many
, it matches if any of the related records match.
referencing-aggregates-and-calculations
Referencing aggregates and calculations
Aggregates are simple, as all aggregates can be referenced in filter expressions (if you are using a data layer that supports it).
For calculations, only those that define an expression can be referenced in other expressions.
Here are some examples:
# given a `full_name` calculation
Ash.Query.filter(User, full_name == "Hob Goblin")
# given a `full_name` calculation that accepts an argument called `delimiter`
Ash.Query.filter(User, full_name(delimiter: "~") == "Hob~Goblin")