User Input
View SourceSurface Claude's approval requests and clarifying questions to users, then return their decisions to the SDK.
Official Documentation: This guide is based on the official Claude Agent SDK documentation. Examples are adapted for Elixir.
While working on a task, Claude sometimes needs to check in with users. It might need permission before deleting files, or need to ask which database to use for a new project. Your application needs to surface these requests to users so Claude can continue with their input.
Claude requests user input in two situations: when it needs permission to use a tool (like deleting files or running commands), and when it has clarifying questions (via the AskUserQuestion tool). Both trigger your :can_use_tool callback, which pauses execution until you return a response. This is different from normal conversation turns where Claude finishes and waits for your next message.
For clarifying questions, Claude generates the questions and options. Your role is to present them to users and return their selections. You cannot add your own questions to this flow; if you need to ask users something yourself, do that separately in your application logic.
This guide shows you how to detect each type of request and respond appropriately.
Detect when Claude needs input
Pass a :can_use_tool callback in your session or query options. The callback fires whenever Claude needs user input, receiving the tool input map and tool use ID as arguments:
{:ok, session} = ClaudeCode.start_link(
can_use_tool: fn %{tool_name: name} = input, _tool_use_id ->
# Prompt user and return :allow or {:deny, reason}
:allow
end
)The callback fires in two cases:
- Tool needs approval: Claude wants to use a tool that is not auto-approved by permission rules or modes. Check the
:tool_namefield for the tool (e.g.,"Bash","Write"). - Claude asks a question: Claude calls the
AskUserQuestiontool. Check iftool_name == "AskUserQuestion"to handle it differently. If you specify a:toolslist, include"AskUserQuestion"for this to work. See Handle clarifying questions for details.
Note: To automatically allow or deny tools without prompting users, use hooks instead. Hooks execute before
:can_use_tooland can allow, deny, or modify requests based on your own logic. You can also use thePermissionRequesthook to send external notifications (Slack, email, push) when Claude is waiting for approval.
Handle tool approval requests
Once you have passed a :can_use_tool callback, it fires when Claude wants to use a tool that is not auto-approved. Your callback receives two arguments:
| Argument | Description |
|---|---|
input (map) | A map containing :tool_name, :input, and other fields about the tool Claude wants to use |
tool_use_id | Currently always nil for :can_use_tool callbacks (reserved for future use) |
The :input field within the map contains tool-specific parameters. Common examples:
| Tool | Input fields |
|---|---|
Bash | "command", "description", "timeout" |
Write | "file_path", "content" |
Edit | "file_path", "old_string", "new_string" |
Read | "file_path", "offset", "limit" |
You can display this information to the user so they can decide whether to allow or reject the action, then return the appropriate response.
The following example asks Claude to create and delete a test file. When Claude attempts each operation, the callback prints the tool request to the terminal and prompts for y/n approval:
{:ok, session} = ClaudeCode.start_link(
can_use_tool: fn %{tool_name: name, input: input}, _tool_use_id ->
IO.puts("\nTool: #{name}")
if name == "Bash" do
IO.puts("Command: #{input["command"]}")
if input["description"], do: IO.puts("Description: #{input["description"]}")
else
IO.puts("Input: #{inspect(input)}")
end
case IO.gets("Allow this action? (y/n): ") |> String.trim() do
"y" -> {:allow, input}
_ -> {:deny, "User denied this action"}
end
end
)
session
|> ClaudeCode.stream("Create a test file in /tmp and then delete it")
|> ClaudeCode.Stream.final_text()
|> IO.puts()This example uses a y/n flow where any input other than "y" is treated as a denial. In practice, you might build a richer UI that lets users modify the request, provide feedback, or redirect Claude entirely. See Respond to tool requests for all the ways you can respond.
Respond to tool requests
Your callback returns one of the following response types:
| Return | Effect |
|---|---|
:allow | Permit the tool call |
{:allow, updated_input} | Permit with modified input |
{:allow, updated_input, permissions: updates} | Permit with modified input and permission updates |
{:deny, reason} | Block the tool call with an explanation |
{:deny, reason, interrupt: true} | Block and interrupt the session |
When allowing with input, pass the tool input (original or modified). When denying, provide a message explaining why. Claude sees this message and may adjust its approach.
# Allow the tool to execute
:allow
# Allow with original input
{:allow, input}
# Block the tool
{:deny, "User rejected this action"}Beyond allowing or denying, you can modify the tool's input or provide context that helps Claude adjust its approach:
- Approve: let the tool execute as Claude requested
- Approve with changes: modify the input before execution (e.g., sanitize paths, add constraints)
- Reject: block the tool and tell Claude why
- Suggest alternative: block but guide Claude toward what the user wants instead
- Redirect entirely: use streaming input to send Claude a completely new instruction
Approve
The user approves the action as-is. Return :allow and the tool executes exactly as Claude requested:
can_use_tool: fn %{tool_name: name}, _id ->
IO.puts("Claude wants to use #{name}")
if confirm?("Allow this action?"), do: :allow, else: {:deny, "User declined"}
endApprove with changes
The user approves but wants to modify the request first. You can change the input before the tool executes. Claude sees the result but is not told you changed anything. Useful for sanitizing parameters, adding constraints, or scoping access:
can_use_tool: fn %{tool_name: "Bash", input: input}, _id ->
# Scope all commands to sandbox
sandboxed = Map.update!(input, "command", &String.replace(&1, "/tmp", "/tmp/sandbox"))
{:allow, sandboxed}
%{input: input}, _id ->
{:allow, input}
endReject
The user does not want this action to happen. Block the tool and provide a message explaining why. Claude sees this message and may try a different approach:
can_use_tool: fn %{tool_name: name} = input, _id ->
if confirm?("Allow #{name}?") do
{:allow, input.input}
else
{:deny, "User rejected this action"}
end
endSuggest alternative
The user does not want this specific action, but has a different idea. Block the tool and include guidance in your message. Claude will read this and decide how to proceed based on your feedback:
can_use_tool: fn %{tool_name: "Bash", input: %{"command" => cmd}} = _input, _id when cmd =~ "rm" ->
{:deny, "User doesn't want to delete files. They asked if you could compress them into an archive instead."}
%{input: input}, _id ->
{:allow, input}
endRedirect entirely
For a complete change of direction (not just a nudge), use streaming input to send Claude a new instruction directly. This bypasses the current tool request and gives Claude entirely new instructions to follow.
Module-based approval
For more complex logic, implement the ClaudeCode.Hook behaviour:
defmodule MyApp.ToolPermissions do
@behaviour ClaudeCode.Hook
@impl true
def call(%{tool_name: "Bash", input: %{"command" => cmd}}, _tool_use_id) do
cond do
String.contains?(cmd, "rm -rf") -> {:deny, "Destructive command blocked"}
String.starts_with?(cmd, "sudo") -> {:deny, "No sudo allowed"}
true -> :allow
end
end
def call(_input, _tool_use_id), do: :allow
end
{:ok, session} = ClaudeCode.start_link(can_use_tool: MyApp.ToolPermissions)See the Hooks guide for the full :can_use_tool API including input rewriting and return value reference.
Handle clarifying questions
When Claude needs more direction on a task with multiple valid approaches, it calls the AskUserQuestion tool. This triggers your :can_use_tool callback with tool_name set to "AskUserQuestion". The input contains Claude's questions as multiple-choice options, which you display to the user and return their selections.
Tip: Clarifying questions are especially common in plan mode, where Claude explores the codebase and asks questions before proposing a plan. This makes plan mode ideal for interactive workflows where you want Claude to gather requirements before making changes.
Step 1: Pass a :can_use_tool callback
Pass a :can_use_tool callback in your session or query options. By default, AskUserQuestion is available. If you specify a :tools list to restrict Claude's capabilities (for example, a read-only agent with only Read, Glob, and Grep), include "AskUserQuestion" in that list. Otherwise, Claude will not be able to ask clarifying questions:
{:ok, session} = ClaudeCode.start_link(
tools: ["Read", "Glob", "Grep", "AskUserQuestion"],
can_use_tool: &my_tool_handler/2
)Step 2: Detect AskUserQuestion
In your callback, check if the tool name equals "AskUserQuestion" to handle it differently from other tools:
def my_tool_handler(%{tool_name: "AskUserQuestion"} = input, tool_use_id) do
handle_clarifying_questions(input)
end
def my_tool_handler(input, _tool_use_id) do
prompt_for_approval(input)
endStep 3: Parse the question input
The input contains Claude's questions in a "questions" list. Each question has a "question" (the text to display), "options" (the choices), and "multiSelect" (whether multiple selections are allowed):
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "How should I format the output?",
"header": "Format",
"options": [
{ "label": "Summary", "description": "Brief overview" },
{ "label": "Detailed", "description": "Full explanation" }
],
"multiSelect": false
},
{
"question": "Which sections should I include?",
"header": "Sections",
"options": [
{ "label": "Introduction", "description": "Opening context" },
{ "label": "Conclusion", "description": "Final summary" }
],
"multiSelect": true
}
]
}Step 4: Collect answers from the user
Present the questions to the user and collect their selections. How you do this depends on your application: a terminal prompt, a LiveView form, a mobile dialog, etc.
Step 5: Return answers to Claude
Build the "answers" map where each key is the "question" text and each value is the selected option's "label":
| From the question object | Use as |
|---|---|
"question" field (e.g., "How should I format the output?") | Key |
Selected option's "label" field (e.g., "Summary") | Value |
For multi-select questions, join multiple labels with ", ". If you support free-text input, use the user's custom text as the value.
{:allow, %{
"questions" => input.input["questions"],
"answers" => %{
"How should I format the output?" => "Summary",
"Which sections should I include?" => "Introduction, Conclusion"
}
}}Question format
The input contains Claude's generated questions in a "questions" list. Each question has these fields:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
"question" | The full question text to display |
"header" | Short label for the question (max 12 characters) |
"options" | List of 2-4 choices, each with "label" and "description" |
"multiSelect" | If true, users can select multiple options |
Here is an example of the structure you will receive:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "How should I format the output?",
"header": "Format",
"options": [
{ "label": "Summary", "description": "Brief overview of key points" },
{ "label": "Detailed", "description": "Full explanation with examples" }
],
"multiSelect": false
}
]
}Response format
Return an "answers" map that maps each question's "question" field to the selected option's "label":
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
"questions" | Pass through the original questions list (required for tool processing) |
"answers" | Map where keys are question text and values are selected labels |
For multi-select questions, join multiple labels with ", ". For free-text input, use the user's custom text directly.
{
"questions": [...],
"answers": {
"How should I format the output?": "Summary",
"Which sections should I include?": "Introduction, Conclusion"
}
}Support free-text input
Claude's predefined options will not always cover what users want. To let users type their own answer:
- Display an additional "Other" choice after Claude's options that accepts text input
- Use the user's custom text as the answer value (not the word "Other")
See the complete example below for a full implementation.
Complete example
Claude asks clarifying questions when it needs user input to proceed. For example, when asked to help decide on a tech stack for a mobile app, Claude might ask about cross-platform vs native, backend preferences, or target platforms. These questions help Claude make decisions that match the user's preferences rather than guessing.
This example handles those questions in a terminal application:
- Route the request: The
:can_use_toolcallback checks if the tool name is"AskUserQuestion"and routes to a dedicated handler - Display questions: The handler loops through the
"questions"list and prints each question with numbered options - Collect input: The user can enter a number to select an option, or type free text directly (e.g., "jquery", "i don't know")
- Map answers: The code checks if input is numeric (uses the option's label) or free text (uses the text directly)
- Return to Claude: The response includes both the original
"questions"list and the"answers"mapping
defmodule MyApp.UserInput do
@behaviour ClaudeCode.Hook
@impl true
def call(%{tool_name: "AskUserQuestion", input: input}, _tool_use_id) do
handle_questions(input)
end
def call(%{input: input}, _tool_use_id) do
# Auto-approve other tools for this example
{:allow, input}
end
defp handle_questions(input) do
questions = input["questions"] || []
answers =
Map.new(questions, fn q ->
IO.puts("\n#{q["header"]}: #{q["question"]}")
options = q["options"] || []
Enum.with_index(options, 1)
|> Enum.each(fn {opt, i} ->
IO.puts(" #{i}. #{opt["label"]} - #{opt["description"]}")
end)
if q["multiSelect"] do
IO.puts(" (Enter numbers separated by commas, or type your own answer)")
else
IO.puts(" (Enter a number, or type your own answer)")
end
response = IO.gets("Your choice: ") |> String.trim()
{q["question"], parse_response(response, options)}
end)
{:allow, %{"questions" => questions, "answers" => answers}}
end
defp parse_response(response, options) do
indices =
response
|> String.split(",")
|> Enum.map(&String.trim/1)
|> Enum.map(&Integer.parse/1)
|> Enum.filter(&match?({_, ""}, &1))
|> Enum.map(fn {n, _} -> n - 1 end)
|> Enum.filter(&(&1 >= 0 and &1 < length(options)))
case indices do
[] -> response
_ -> indices |> Enum.map(&Enum.at(options, &1)["label"]) |> Enum.join(", ")
end
end
end
{:ok, session} = ClaudeCode.start_link(can_use_tool: MyApp.UserInput)
session
|> ClaudeCode.stream("Help me decide on the tech stack for a new mobile app")
|> ClaudeCode.Stream.final_text()
|> IO.puts()Limitations
- Subagents:
AskUserQuestionis not currently available in subagents spawned via the Task tool - Question limits: each
AskUserQuestioncall supports 1-4 questions with 2-4 options each
Other ways to get user input
The :can_use_tool callback and AskUserQuestion tool cover most approval and clarification scenarios, but the SDK offers other ways to get input from users:
Streaming input
Use streaming input when you need to:
- Interrupt the agent mid-task: send a cancel signal or change direction while Claude is working
- Provide additional context: add information Claude needs without waiting for it to ask
- Build chat interfaces: let users send follow-up messages during long-running operations
Streaming input is ideal for conversational UIs where users interact with the agent throughout execution, not just at approval checkpoints.
Custom tools
Use custom tools when you need to:
- Collect structured input: build forms, wizards, or multi-step workflows that go beyond
AskUserQuestion's multiple-choice format - Integrate external approval systems: connect to existing ticketing, workflow, or approval platforms
- Implement domain-specific interactions: create tools tailored to your application's needs, like code review interfaces or deployment checklists
Custom tools give you full control over the interaction, but require more implementation work than using the built-in :can_use_tool callback.
Related resources
- Configure permissions -- Set up permission modes and rules
- Control execution with hooks -- Run custom code at key points in the agent lifecycle
- Sessions -- Multi-turn conversations and session management