Ecto v2.2.8 Ecto.Query View Source
Provides the Query DSL.
Queries are used to retrieve and manipulate data from a repository
(see Ecto.Repo
). Ecto queries come in two flavors: keyword-based
and macro-based. Most examples will use the keyword-based syntax,
the macro one will be explored in later sections.
Let’s see a sample query:
# Imports only from/2 of Ecto.Query
import Ecto.Query, only: [from: 2]
# Create a query
query = from u in "users",
where: u.age > 18,
select: u.name
# Send the query to the repository
Repo.all(query)
In the example above, we are directly querying the “users” table from the database.
Query expressions
Ecto allows a limited set of expressions inside queries. In the
query below, for example, we use u.age
to access a field, the
>
comparison operator and the literal 0
:
query = from u in "users", where: u.age > 0, select: u.name
You can find the full list of operations in Ecto.Query.API
.
Besides the operations listed there, the following literals are
supported in queries:
- Integers:
1
,2
,3
- Floats:
1.0
,2.0
,3.0
- Booleans:
true
,false
- Binaries:
<<1, 2, 3>>
- Strings:
"foo bar"
,~s(this is a string)
- Arrays:
[1, 2, 3]
,~w(interpolate words)
All other types and dynamic values must be passed as a parameter using interpolation as explained below.
Interpolation and casting
External values and Elixir expressions can be injected into a query
expression with ^
:
def with_minimum(age, height_ft) do
from u in "users",
where: u.age > ^age and u.height > ^(height_ft * 3.28),
select: u.name
end
with_minimum(18, 5.0)
When interpolating values, you may want to explicitly tell Ecto what is the expected type of the value being interpolated:
age = "18"
Repo.all(from u in "users",
where: u.age > type(^age, :integer),
select: u.name)
In the example above, Ecto will cast the age to type integer. When
a value cannot be cast, Ecto.Query.CastError
is raised.
To avoid the repetition of always specifying the types, you may define
an Ecto.Schema
. In such cases, Ecto will analyze your queries and
automatically cast the interpolated “age” when compared to the u.age
field, as long as the age field is defined with type :integer
in
your schema:
age = "18"
Repo.all(from u in User, where: u.age > ^age, select: u.name)
Another advantage of using schemas is that we no longer need to specify the select option in queries, as by default Ecto will retrieve all fields specified in the schema:
age = "18"
Repo.all(from u in User, where: u.age > ^age)
For this reason, we will use schemas on the remaining examples but remember Ecto does not require them in order to write queries.
Composition
Ecto queries are composable. For example, the query above can actually be defined in two parts:
# Create a query
query = from u in User, where: u.age > 18
# Extend the query
query = from u in query, select: u.name
Composing queries uses the same syntax as creating a query.
The difference is that, instead of passing a schema like User
on the right side of in
, we passed the query itself.
Any value can be used on the right-side of in
as long as it implements
the Ecto.Queryable
protocol. For now, we know the protocol is
implemented for both atoms (like User
) and strings (like “users”).
In any case, regardless if a schema has been given or not, Ecto queries are always composable thanks to its binding system.
Query bindings
On the left side of in
we specify the query bindings. This is
done inside from and join clauses. In the query below u
is a
binding and u.age
is a field access using this binding.
query = from u in User, where: u.age > 18
Bindings are not exposed from the query. When composing queries you must specify bindings again for each refinement query. For example to further narrow-down above query we again need to tell Ecto what bindings to expect:
query = from u in query, select: u.city
Bindings in Ecto are positional, and the names do not have to be consistent between input and refinement queries. For example, the query above could also be written as:
query = from q in query, select: q.city
It would make no difference to Ecto. This is important because it allows developers to compose queries without caring about the bindings used in the initial query.
When using joins, the bindings should be matched in the order they are specified:
# Create a query
query = from p in Post,
join: c in Comment, where: c.post_id == p.id
# Extend the query
query = from [p, c] in query,
select: {p.title, c.body}
You are not required to specify all bindings when composing. For example, if we would like to order the results above by post insertion date, we could further extend it as:
query = from q in query, order_by: q.inserted_at
The example above will work if the input query has 1 or 10
bindings. In the example above, we will always sort by the
inserted_at
column from the from
source.
Similarly, if you are interested only on the last binding (or the last bindings) in a query, you can use … to specify “all bindings before” and match on the last one.
For instance, imagine you wrote:
posts_with_comments =
from p in query, join: c in Comment, where: c.post_id == p.id
And now we want to make sure to return both the post title and the comment body. Although we may not know how many bindings there are in the query, we are sure posts is the first binding and comments are the last one, so we can write:
from [p, ..., c] in posts_with_comments, select: {p.title, c.body}
In other words, ...
will include all the binding between the first and
the last, which may be no binding at all, one or many. Using ...
can
be handy from time to time but most of its uses can be avoided by relying
on the keyword query syntax when writing queries.
Bindingless operations
Although bindings are extremely useful when working with joins,
they are not necessary when the query has only the from
clause.
For such cases, Ecto supports a way for building queries
without specifying the binding:
from Post,
where: [category: "fresh and new"],
order_by: [desc: :published_at],
select: [:id, :title, :body]
The query above will select all posts with category “fresh and new”, order by the most recently published, and return Post structs with only the id, title and body fields set. It is equivalent to:
from p in Post,
where: p.category == "fresh and new",
order_by: [desc: p.published_at],
select: struct(p, [:id, :title, :body])
One advantage of bindingless queries is that they are data-driven and therefore useful for dynamically building queries. For example, the query above could also be written as:
where = [category: "fresh and new"]
order_by = [desc: :published_at]
select = [:id, :title, :body]
from Post, where: ^where, order_by: ^order_by, select: ^select
This feature is very useful when queries need to be built based on some user input, like web search forms, CLIs and so on.
Fragments
If you need an escape hatch, Ecto provides fragments
(see Ecto.Query.API.fragment/1
) to inject SQL (and non-SQL)
fragments into queries.
For example, to get all posts while running the “lower(?)”
function in the database where p.title
is interpolated
in place of ?
, one can write:
from p in Post,
where: is_nil(p.published_at) and
fragment("lower(?)", p.title) == ^title
Also, most adapters provide direct APIs for queries, like
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query/4
, allowing developers to
completely bypass Ecto queries.
Macro API
In all examples so far we have used the keywords query syntax to create a query:
import Ecto.Query
from u in "users", where: u.age > 18, select: u.name
Due to the prevalence of the pipe operator in Elixir, Ecto also supports a pipe-based syntax:
"users"
|> where([u], u.age > 18)
|> select([u], u.name)
The keyword-based and pipe-based examples are equivalent. The downside of using macros is that the binding must be specified for every operation. However, since keyword-based and pipe-based examples are equivalent, the bindingless syntax also works for macros:
"users"
|> where([u], u.age > 18)
|> select([:name])
Such allows developers to write queries using bindings only in more complex query expressions.
This module documents each of those macros, providing examples in both the keywords query and pipe expression formats.
Query Prefix
It is possible to set a prefix for the queries. For Postgres users, this will specify the schema where the table is located, while for MySQL users this will specify the database where the table is located. When no prefix is set, Postgres queries are assumed to be in the public schema, while MySQL queries are assumed to be in the database set in the config for the repo.
To set the prefix on a query:
results =
query # May be User or an Ecto.Query itself
|> Ecto.Queryable.to_query
|> Map.put(:prefix, "foo")
|> Repo.all
When a prefix is set in a query, all loaded structs will belong to that
prefix, so operations like update and delete will be applied to the
proper prefix. In case you want to manually set the prefix for new data,
specially on insert, use Ecto.put_meta/2
.
Link to this section Summary
Functions
A distinct query expression
Builds a dynamic query expression
Resets a previously set field on a query
Restricts the query to return the first result ordered by primary key
Creates a query
A group by query expression
An AND having query expression
A join query expression
Restricts the query to return the last result ordered by primary key
A limit query expression
A lock query expression
An offset query expression
An OR having query expression
An OR where query expression
An order by query expression
Preloads the associations into the given struct
A select query expression
Mergeable select query expression
Converts a query into a subquery
An update query expression
An AND where query expression
Link to this section Types
t() :: %Ecto.Query{assocs: term(), distinct: term(), from: term(), group_bys: term(), havings: term(), joins: term(), limit: term(), lock: term(), offset: term(), order_bys: term(), prefix: term(), preloads: term(), select: term(), sources: term(), updates: term(), wheres: term()}
Link to this section Functions
A distinct query expression.
When true, only keeps distinct values from the resulting select expression.
If supported by your database, you can also pass query expressions
to distinct and it will generate a query with DISTINCT ON. In such
cases, distinct
accepts exactly the same expressions as order_by
and any distinct
expression will be automatically prepended to the
order_by
expressions in case there is any order_by
expression.
Keywords examples
# Returns the list of different categories in the Post schema
from(p in Post, distinct: true, select: p.category)
# If your database supports DISTINCT ON(),
# you can pass expressions to distinct too
from(p in Post,
distinct: p.category,
order_by: [p.date])
# The DISTINCT ON() also supports ordering similar to ORDER BY.
from(p in Post,
distinct: [desc: p.category],
order_by: [p.date])
# Using atoms
from(p in Post, distinct: :category, order_by: :date)
Expressions example
Post
|> distinct(true)
|> order_by([p], [p.category, p.author])
Builds a dynamic query expression.
Dynamic query expressions allows developers to build queries expression bit by bit so they are later interpolated in a query.
Examples
For example, imagine you have a set of conditions you want to build your query on:
dynamic = false
dynamic =
if params["is_public"] do
dynamic([p], p.is_public or ^dynamic)
else
dynamic
end
dynamic =
if params["allow_reviewers"] do
dynamic([p, a], a.reviewer == true or ^dynamic)
else
dynamic
end
from query, where: ^dynamic
In the example above, we were able to build the query expressions bit by bit, using different bindings, and later interpolate it all at once inside the query.
A dynamic expression can always be interpolated inside another dynamic expression and into the constructs described below.
where
, having
and a join
’s `on’
dynamic
can be interpolated at the root of a where
, having
or
a join
’s on
.
For example, the following is forbidden because it is not at the
root of a where
:
from q in query, where: q.some_condition and ^dynamic
Fortunately that’s easily solvable by simply rewriting it to:
dynamic = dynamic([q], q.some_condition and ^dynamic)
from query, where: ^dynamic
Updates
Dynamic is also supported as each field in an update, for example:
update_to = dynamic([p], p.sum / p.count)
from query, update: [set: [average: ^update_to]]
Resets a previously set field on a query.
It can reset any query field except the query source (from
).
Example
query |> Ecto.Query.exclude(:select)
Restricts the query to return the first result ordered by primary key.
The query will be automatically ordered by the primary key
unless order_by
is given or order_by
is set in the query.
Limit is always set to 1.
Examples
Post |> first |> Repo.one
query |> first(:inserted_at) |> Repo.one
Creates a query.
It can either be a keyword query or a query expression.
If it is a keyword query the first argument must be
either an in
expression, or a value that implements
the Ecto.Queryable
protocol. If the query needs a
reference to the data source in any other part of the
expression, then an in
must be used to create a reference
variable. The second argument should be a keyword query
where the keys are expression types and the values are
expressions.
If it is a query expression the first argument must be
a value that implements the Ecto.Queryable
protocol
and the second argument the expression.
Keywords example
from(c in City, select: c)
Expressions example
City |> select([c], c)
Examples
def paginate(query, page, size) do
from query,
limit: ^size,
offset: ^((page-1) * size)
end
The example above does not use in
because limit
and offset
do not require a reference to the data source. However, extending
the query with a where expression would require the use of in
:
def published(query) do
from p in query, where: not(is_nil(p.published_at))
end
Notice we have created a p
variable to reference the query’s
original data source. This assumes that the original query
only had one source. When the given query has more than one source, a variable
must be given for each in the order they were bound:
def published_multi(query) do
from [p,o] in query,
where: not(is_nil(p.published_at)) and not(is_nil(o.published_at))
end
Note the variables p
and o
can be named whatever you like
as they have no importance in the query sent to the database.
A group by query expression.
Groups together rows from the schema that have the same values in the given
fields. Using group_by
“groups” the query giving it different semantics
in the select
expression. If a query is grouped, only fields that were
referenced in the group_by
can be used in the select
or if the field
is given as an argument to an aggregate function.
group_by
also accepts a list of atoms where each atom refers to
a field in source.
Keywords examples
# Returns the number of posts in each category
from(p in Post,
group_by: p.category,
select: {p.category, count(p.id)})
# Using atoms
from(p in Post, group_by: :category, select: {p.category, count(p.id)})
Expressions example
Post |> group_by([p], p.category) |> select([p], count(p.id))
An AND having query expression.
Like where
, having
filters rows from the schema, but after the grouping is
performed giving it the same semantics as select
for a grouped query
(see group_by/3
). having
groups the query even if the query has no
group_by
expression.
Keywords example
# Returns the number of posts in each category where the
# average number of comments is above ten
from(p in Post,
group_by: p.category,
having: avg(p.num_comments) > 10,
select: {p.category, count(p.id)})
Expressions example
Post
|> group_by([p], p.category)
|> having([p], avg(p.num_comments) > 10)
|> select([p], count(p.id))
A join query expression.
Receives a source that is to be joined to the query and a condition for
the join. The join condition can be any expression that evaluates
to a boolean value. The join is by default an inner join, the qualifier
can be changed by giving the atoms: :inner
, :left
, :right
, :cross
,
:full
, :inner_lateral
or :left_lateral
. For a keyword query the :join
keyword can be changed to: :inner_join
, :left_join
, :right_join
,
:cross_join
, :full_join
, :inner_lateral_join
or :left_lateral_join
.
Currently it is possible to join on:
- an
Ecto.Schema
, such asp in Post
- an Ecto query with zero or more where clauses, such as
from "posts", where: [public: true]
- an association, such as
c in assoc(post, :comments)
- a query fragment, such as
c in fragment("SOME COMPLEX QUERY")
- a subquery, such as
c in subquery(another_query)
The fragment support exists mostly for handling lateral joins. See “Joining with fragments” below.
Keywords examples
from c in Comment,
join: p in Post, on: p.id == c.post_id,
select: {p.title, c.text}
from p in Post,
left_join: c in assoc(p, :comments),
select: {p, c}
Keywords can also be given or interpolated as part of on
:
from c in Comment,
join: p in Post, on: [id: c.post_id],
select: {p.title, c.text}
Any key in on
will apply to the currently joined expression.
It is also possible to interpolate an Ecto query on the right side
of in
. For example, the query above can also be written as:
posts = Post
from c in Comment,
join: p in ^posts, on: [id: c.post_id],
select: {p.title, c.text}
The above is specially useful to dynamically join on existing queries, for example, choosing between public posts or posts that have been recently published:
posts =
if params["drafts"] do
from p in Post, where: [drafts: true]
else
from p in Post, where: [public: true]
end
from c in Comment,
join: p in ^posts, on: [id: c.post_id],
select: {p.title, c.text}
Only simple queries with where
expressions can be interpolated
in join.
Expressions examples
Comment
|> join(:inner, [c], p in Post, c.post_id == p.id)
|> select([c, p], {p.title, c.text})
Post
|> join(:left, [p], c in assoc(p, :comments))
|> select([p, c], {p, c})
Post
|> join(:left, [p], c in Comment, c.post_id == p.id and c.is_visible == true)
|> select([p, c], {p, c})
Joining with fragments
When you need to join on a complex query, Ecto supports fragments in joins:
Comment
|> join(:inner, [c], p in fragment("SOME COMPLEX QUERY", c.id, ^some_param))
Although using fragments in joins is discouraged in favor of Ecto Query syntax, they are necessary when writing lateral joins as lateral joins require a subquery that refer to previous bindings:
Game
|> join(:inner_lateral, [g], gs in fragment("SELECT * FROM games_sold AS gs WHERE gs.game_id = ? ORDER BY gs.sold_on LIMIT 2", g.id))
|> select([g, gs], {g.name, gs.sold_on})
Restricts the query to return the last result ordered by primary key.
The query ordering will be automatically reversed, with ASC columns becoming DESC columns (and vice-versa) and limit is set to 1. If there is no ordering, the query will be automatically ordered decreasingly by primary key.
Examples
Post |> last |> Repo.one
query |> last(:inserted_at) |> Repo.one
A limit query expression.
Limits the number of rows returned from the result. Can be any expression but has to evaluate to an integer value and it can’t include any field.
If limit
is given twice, it overrides the previous value.
Keywords example
from(u in User, where: u.id == ^current_user, limit: 1)
Expressions example
User |> where([u], u.id == ^current_user) |> limit(1)
A lock query expression.
Provides support for row-level pessimistic locking using
SELECT ... FOR UPDATE
or other, database-specific, locking clauses.
expr
can be any expression but has to evaluate to a boolean value or to a
string and it can’t include any fields.
If lock
is used more than once, the last one used takes precedence.
Ecto also supports optimistic
locking but not
through queries. For more information on optimistic locking, have a look at
the Ecto.Changeset.optimistic_lock/3
function
Keywords example
from(u in User, where: u.id == ^current_user, lock: "FOR SHARE NOWAIT")
Expressions example
User |> where(u.id == ^current_user) |> lock("FOR SHARE NOWAIT")
An offset query expression.
Offsets the number of rows selected from the result. Can be any expression but it must evaluate to an integer value and it can’t include any field.
If offset
is given twice, it overrides the previous value.
Keywords example
# Get all posts on page 4
from(p in Post, limit: 10, offset: 30)
Expressions example
Post |> limit(10) |> offset(30)
An OR having query expression.
Like having
but combines with the previous expression by using
OR
. or_having
behaves for having
the same way or_where
behaves for where
.
Keywords example
# Augment a previous group_by with a having condition.
from(p in query, or_having: avg(p.num_comments) > 10)
Expressions example
# Augment a previous group_by with a having condition.
Post |> or_having([p], avg(p.num_comments) > 10)
An OR where query expression.
Behaves exactly the same as where
except it combines with any previous
expression by using an OR
. All expressions have to evaluate to a boolean
value.
or_where
also accepts a keyword list where each key is a field to be
compared with the given value. Each key-value pair will be combined
using AND
, exactly as in where
.
Keywords example
from(c in City, where: [country: "Sweden"], or_where: [country: "Brazil"])
If interpolating keyword lists, the keyword list entries are combined using ANDs and joined to any existing expression with an OR:
filters = [country: "USA", name: "New York"]
from(c in City, where: [country: "Sweden"], or_where: ^filters)
is equivalent to:
from c in City, where: (c.country == "Sweden") or
(c.country == "USA" and c.name == "New York")
The behaviour above is by design to keep the changes between where
and or_where
minimal. Plus, if you have a keyword list and you
would like each pair to be combined using or
, it can be easily done
with Enum.reduce/3
:
filters = [country: "USA", is_tax_exempt: true]
Enum.reduce(filters, City, fn {key, value}, query ->
from q in query, or_where: field(q, ^key) == ^value
end)
which will be equivalent to:
from c in City, or_where: (c.country == "USA"), or_where: c.is_tax_exempt == true
Expressions example
City |> where([c], c.country == "Sweden") |> or_where([c], c.country == "Brazil")
An order by query expression.
Orders the fields based on one or more fields. It accepts a single field
or a list of fields. The default direction is ascending (:asc
) and can be
customized in a keyword list as shown in the examples.
There can be several order by expressions in a query and new expressions are always appended to the previous ones.
order_by
also accepts a list of atoms where each atom refers to a field in
source or a keyword list where the direction is given as key and the field
to order as value.
Keywords examples
from(c in City, order_by: c.name, order_by: c.population)
from(c in City, order_by: [c.name, c.population])
from(c in City, order_by: [asc: c.name, desc: c.population])
from(c in City, order_by: [:name, :population])
from(c in City, order_by: [asc: :name, desc: :population])
A keyword list can also be interpolated:
values = [asc: :name, desc: :population]
from(c in City, order_by: ^values)
Expressions example
City |> order_by([c], asc: c.name, desc: c.population)
City |> order_by(asc: :name) # Sorts by the cities name
Preloads the associations into the given struct.
Preloading allows developers to specify associations that are preloaded into the struct. Consider this example:
Repo.all from p in Post, preload: [:comments]
The example above will fetch all posts from the database and then do a separate query returning all comments associated with the given posts.
However, often times, you want posts and comments to be selected and filtered in the same query. For such cases, you can explicitly tell the association to be preloaded into the struct:
Repo.all from p in Post,
join: c in assoc(p, :comments),
where: c.published_at > p.updated_at,
preload: [comments: c]
In the example above, instead of issuing a separate query to fetch comments, Ecto will fetch posts and comments in a single query.
Nested associations can also be preloaded in both formats:
Repo.all from p in Post,
preload: [comments: :likes]
Repo.all from p in Post,
join: c in assoc(p, :comments),
join: l in assoc(c, :likes),
where: l.inserted_at > c.updated_at,
preload: [comments: {c, likes: l}]
Keep in mind neither format can be nested arbitrarily. For
example, the query below is invalid because we cannot preload
likes with the join association c
.
Repo.all from p in Post,
join: c in assoc(p, :comments),
preload: [comments: {c, :likes}]
Preload queries
Preload also allows queries to be given, allowing you to filter or customize how the preloads are fetched:
comments_query = from c in Comment, order_by: c.published_at
Repo.all from p in Post, preload: [comments: ^comments_query]
The example above will issue two queries, one for loading posts and
then another for loading the comments associated with the posts.
Comments will be ordered by published_at
.
Note: keep in mind operations like limit and offset in the preload query will affect the whole result set and not each association. For example, the query below:
comments_query = from c in Comment, order_by: c.popularity, limit: 5
Repo.all from p in Post, preload: [comments: ^comments_query]
won’t bring the top of comments per post. Rather, it will only bring the 5 top comments across all posts.
Preload functions
Preload also allows functions to be given. In such cases, the function receives the IDs to be fetched and it must return the associated data. This data will then be mapped and sorted:
comment_preloader = fn post_ids -> fetch_comments_by_post_ids(post_ids) end
Repo.all from p in Post, preload: [comments: ^comment_preloader]
This is useful when the whole dataset was already loaded or must be explicitly fetched from elsewhere.
Keywords example
# Returns all posts, their associated comments, and the associated
# likes for those comments.
from(p in Post,
preload: [:comments, comments: :likes],
select: p)
Expressions examples
Post |> preload(:comments) |> select([p], p)
Post |> join(:left, [p], c in assoc(p, :comments)) |> preload([p, c], [:user, comments: c]) |> select([p], p)
A select query expression.
Selects which fields will be selected from the schema and any transformations that should be performed on the fields. Any expression that is accepted in a query can be a select field.
Select also allows each expression to be wrapped in lists, tuples or maps as shown in the examples below. A full schema can also be selected.
There can only be one select expression in a query, if the select expression
is omitted, the query will by default select the full schema. If select is
given more than once, an error is raised. Use exclude/2
if you would like
to remove a previous select for overriding or see select_merge/3
for a
limited version of select
that is composable and can be called multiple
times.
select
also accepts a list of atoms where each atom refers to a field in
the source to be selected.
Keywords examples
from(c in City, select: c) # returns the schema as a struct
from(c in City, select: {c.name, c.population})
from(c in City, select: [c.name, c.county])
from(c in City, select: %{n: c.name, answer: 42})
from(c in City, select: %{c | alternative_name: c.name})
from(c in City, select: %Data{name: c.name})
It is also possible to select a struct and limit the returned fields at the same time:
from(City, select: [:name])
The syntax above is equivalent to:
from(city in City, select: struct(city, [:name]))
You can also write:
from(city in City, select: map(city, [:name]))
If you want a map with only the selected fields to be returned.
For more information, read the docs for Ecto.Query.API.struct/2
and Ecto.Query.API.map/2
.
Expressions examples
City |> select([c], c)
City |> select([c], {c.name, c.country})
City |> select([c], %{"name" => c.name})
City |> select([:name])
City |> select([c], struct(c, [:name]))
City |> select([c], map(c, [:name]))
Mergeable select query expression.
This macro is similar to select/3
except it may be specified
multiple times as long as every entry is a map. This is useful
for merging and composing selects. For example:
query = from p in Post, select: %{}
query =
if include_title? do
from p in query, select_merge: %{title: p.title}
else
query
end
query =
if include_visits? do
from p in query, select_merge: %{visits: p.visits}
else
query
end
In the example above, the query is built little by little by merging into a final map. If both conditions above are true, the final query would be equivalent to:
from p in Post, select: %{title: p.title, visits: p.visits}
If :select_merge
is called and there is no value selected previously,
it will default to the source, p
in the example above.
The left-side of a merge can be a struct or a map. The right side must always be a map. If the left-side is a struct, the fields on the right side must be part of the struct, otherwise an error is raised.
Converts a query into a subquery.
If a subquery is given, returns the subquery itself.
If any other value is given, it is converted to a query via
Ecto.Queryable
and wrapped in the Ecto.SubQuery
struct.
Subqueries are currently only supported in the from
and join
fields.
Examples
# Get the average salary of the top 10 highest salaries
query = from Employee, order_by: [desc: :salary], limit: 10
from e in subquery(query), select: avg(e.salary)
A prefix can be specified for a subquery, similar to standard repo operations:
query = from Employee, order_by: [desc: :salary], limit: 10
from e in subquery(query, prefix: "my_prefix"), select: avg(e.salary)
Although subqueries are not allowed in WHERE expressions, most subqueries in WHERE expression can be rewritten as JOINs. Imagine you want to write this query:
UPDATE posts
SET sync_started_at = $1
WHERE id IN (
SELECT id FROM posts
WHERE synced = false AND (sync_started_at IS NULL OR sync_started_at < $1)
LIMIT $2
)
If you attempt to write it as where: p.id in ^subquery(foo)
,
Ecto won’t accept such query. However, the subquery above can be
written as a JOIN, which is supported by Ecto. The final Ecto
query will look like this:
subset_query = from(p in Post,
where: p.synced == false and
(is_nil(p.sync_started_at) or p.sync_started_at < ^min_sync_started_at),
limit: ^batch_size
)
Repo.update_all(
from(p in Post, join: s in subquery(subset_query), on: s.id == p.id),
set: [sync_started_at: NaiveDateTime.utc_now()]
end)
An update query expression.
Updates are used to update the filtered entries. In order for
updates to be applied, Ecto.Repo.update_all/3
must be invoked.
Keywords example
from(u in User, update: [set: [name: "new name"]])
Expressions example
User |> update([u], set: [name: "new name"])
User |> update(set: [name: "new name"])
Interpolation
new_name = "new name"
from(u in User, update: [set: [name: ^new_name]])
new_name = "new name"
from(u in User, update: [set: [name: fragment("upper(?)", ^new_name)]])
Operators
The update expression in Ecto supports the following operators:
set
- sets the given field in the table to the given valuefrom(u in User, update: [set: [name: “new name”]])
inc
- increments (or decrements if the value is negative) the given field in the table by the given valuefrom(u in User, update: [inc: [accesses: 1]])
push
- pushes (appends) the given value to the end of the array fieldfrom(u in User, update: [push: [tags: “cool”]])
pull
- pulls (removes) the given value from the array fieldfrom(u in User, update: [pull: [tags: “not cool”]])
An AND where query expression.
where
expressions are used to filter the result set. If there is more
than one where expression, they are combined with an and
operator. All
where expressions have to evaluate to a boolean value.
where
also accepts a keyword list where the field given as key is going to
be compared with the given value. The fields will always refer to the source
given in from
.
Keywords example
from(c in City, where: c.country == "Sweden")
from(c in City, where: [country: "Sweden"])
It is also possible to interpolate the whole keyword list, allowing you to dynamically filter the source:
filters = [country: "Sweden"]
from(c in City, where: ^filters)
Expressions example
City |> where([c], c.country == "Sweden")
City |> where(country: "Sweden")