This guide covers the workflow contract that Squid Mesh supports today.
Define A Workflow
Workflows are Elixir modules that use SquidMesh.Workflow and declare:
- one trigger
- one payload contract
- one or more steps
- transitions between steps
- optional dependency-based
after: [...]joins on steps that wait for other work - optional retry policy on the steps that own side effects
defmodule Billing.Workflows.PaymentRecovery do
use SquidMesh.Workflow
workflow do
trigger :payment_recovery do
manual()
payload do
field(:account_id, :string)
field(:invoice_id, :string)
field(:attempt_id, :string)
field(:gateway_url, :string)
end
end
step(:load_invoice, Billing.Steps.LoadInvoice)
step(:wait_for_settlement, :wait, duration: 5_000)
step(:log_recovery_attempt, :log,
message: "Invoice loaded, checking gateway status",
level: :info
)
step(:check_gateway_status, Billing.Steps.CheckGatewayStatus,
retry: [max_attempts: 5, backoff: [type: :exponential, min: 1_000, max: 30_000]]
)
step(:notify_customer, Billing.Steps.NotifyCustomer)
transition(:load_invoice, on: :ok, to: :wait_for_settlement)
transition(:wait_for_settlement, on: :ok, to: :log_recovery_attempt)
transition(:log_recovery_attempt, on: :ok, to: :check_gateway_status)
transition(:check_gateway_status, on: :ok, to: :notify_customer)
transition(:notify_customer, on: :ok, to: :complete)
end
endTriggers
Triggers define how a workflow run starts.
Supported trigger types:
manual()cron(expression, timezone: "Etc/UTC")
Trigger names are business-oriented entrypoints such as :payment_recovery or
:invoice_delivery. The trigger type describes how that entrypoint is invoked.
Current boundary:
- trigger metadata is validated and stored in the workflow definition
- manual triggers are runnable through the public API
- cron triggers are activated by opting workflows into
SquidMesh.Plugins.Cron
Cron workflow example:
defmodule Content.Workflows.PostDailyDigest do
use SquidMesh.Workflow
workflow do
trigger :daily_digest do
cron("0 9 * * 1-5", timezone: "Etc/UTC")
payload do
field(:feed_url, :string, default: "https://example.com/feed.xml")
field(:discord_webhook_url, :string)
field(:posted_on, :string, default: {:today, :iso8601})
end
end
step(:fetch_feed, Content.Steps.FetchFeed)
step(:build_digest, Content.Steps.BuildDigest)
step(:post_to_discord, Content.Steps.PostToDiscord,
retry: [max_attempts: 5, backoff: [type: :exponential, min: 1_000, max: 30_000]]
)
transition(:fetch_feed, on: :ok, to: :build_digest)
transition(:build_digest, on: :ok, to: :post_to_discord)
transition(:post_to_discord, on: :ok, to: :complete)
end
endHost-app opt-in example:
config :my_app, Oban,
repo: MyApp.Repo,
plugins: [
{SquidMesh.Plugins.Cron,
workflows: [
MyApp.Workflows.DailyStandup
]}
],
queues: [squid_mesh: 10]Current cron boundary:
- Squid Mesh declares cron intent in the workflow DSL
- Oban performs the actual recurring scheduling
- cron workflow registration is static at boot today
Payload
The trigger payload block defines the run input contract.
payload do
field(:account_id, :string)
field(:invoice_id, :string)
field(:prompt_date, :string, default: {:today, :iso8601})
endSupported field types today:
:string:integer:float:boolean:map:list:atom
Supported defaults today:
- literal values that match the declared field type
{:today, :iso8601}for ISO-8601 dates generated at run creation time
Payload validation runs before the run is persisted.
Steps
Each step is either:
- a module that performs domain work
- a built-in primitive supplied by the runtime
Module step:
step(:load_invoice, Billing.Steps.LoadInvoice)Built-in steps:
step(:wait_for_settlement, :wait, duration: 5_000)
step(:log_recovery_attempt, :log, message: "Checking gateway status", level: :info)
step(:wait_for_approval, :pause)
approval_step(:wait_for_review, output: :approval)Built-in step options supported today:
:waitrequiresduration:logrequiresmessageand acceptslevel:pauseintentionally stops the run at that step until an operator resumes itapproval_step/2pauses the run for an explicit approve/reject decision and uses:okor:errortransitions to continue:waituses Oban-delayed continuation so long waits do not block a worker slot:pauseis supported in transition-based workflows; dependency-based workflows cannot declare:pauseapproval_step/2is also transition-based only; dependency-based workflows cannot declare built-in:approvalsteps
Manual approval example:
approval_step(:wait_for_approval, output: :approval)
step(:record_approval, Billing.Steps.RecordApproval,
input: [:account_id, :approval],
output: :approval
)
step(:record_rejection, Billing.Steps.RecordRejection,
input: [:account_id, :approval],
output: :approval
)
transition(:wait_for_approval, on: :ok, to: :record_approval)
transition(:wait_for_approval, on: :error, to: :record_rejection)
transition(:record_approval, on: :ok, to: :complete)
transition(:record_rejection, on: :ok, to: :complete)When a run is paused at an approval step, inspect it as usual and then approve or reject it through the public API:
{:ok, paused_run} = SquidMesh.inspect_run(run_id, include_history: true)
{:ok, approved_run} = SquidMesh.approve_run(run_id, %{actor: "ops_123"})
{:ok, rejected_run} = SquidMesh.reject_run(run_id, %{actor: "ops_456"})With include_history: true, the inspected run also exposes audit_events so
host apps can show who paused, resumed, approved, or rejected the run and when:
Enum.map(paused_run.audit_events, &{&1.type, &1.step})
#=> [{:paused, :wait_for_approval}]Manual-review durability notes:
approval_step/2is only supported in transition-based workflows- the approval step stays
:runningwhile the run is:paused approve_run/3completes that step and advances the declared:okpathreject_run/3completes that step and advances the declared:errorpath- reviewer identity, decision, timestamp, and optional review metadata are persisted in the completed step output and merged run context
inspect_run(..., include_history: true)also returns durable audit events for pause, resume, approval, and rejection actions- the resolved
:okand:errortargets plus output-mapping metadata are persisted with the paused step so restart or deploy boundaries do not recompute review semantics from the current workflow definition - host apps should apply the latest Squid Mesh migrations before using pause-resume in existing environments
Step Modules
Custom steps typically use Jido.Action and return workflow output in a plain
map.
defmodule Billing.Steps.CheckGatewayStatus do
use Jido.Action,
name: "check_gateway_status",
description: "Checks gateway state",
schema: [
invoice: [type: :map, required: true],
gateway_url: [type: :string, required: true]
]
@impl true
def run(%{invoice: invoice, gateway_url: gateway_url}, _context) do
case SquidMesh.Tools.invoke(SquidMesh.Tools.HTTP, %{method: :get, url: gateway_url}) do
{:ok, result} ->
{:ok, %{gateway_check: %{invoice_id: invoice.id, status: result.payload.body}}}
{:error, error} ->
{:error, SquidMesh.Tools.Error.to_map(error)}
end
end
endStep result contract:
- success:
{:ok, map()} - failure:
{:error, map()}
Data Flow Between Steps
Each run starts with its validated payload.
When a step succeeds:
- Squid Mesh merges the returned map into the run context
- the next step receives the original payload merged with the accumulated context
That means later steps can use values produced by earlier steps without manual state persistence in the host application.
If you want a step to consume only a subset of the available data, declare an explicit input mapping:
step(:load_account, Billing.Steps.LoadAccount, input: [:account_id], output: :account)
step(:send_email, Billing.Steps.SendEmail, input: [:account, :invoice_id], output: :delivery)In that example:
:load_accountreceives only%{account_id: ...}- its returned map is stored under
:account :send_emailreceives only%{account: ..., invoice_id: ...}- its returned map is stored under
:delivery
Current boundary:
- run context is still a flat merged map
- explicit
input: [...]lets a step declare which keys it consumes - explicit
output: :keylets a step namespace its returned map under one top-level key - dependency-based workflows with parallel branches should still emit disjoint top-level keys unless they intentionally namespace outputs
- if multiple parallel branches write the same key, the result is not a stable workflow contract today
Dependency-Based Steps
Steps can also wait on explicit dependencies instead of success transitions:
step(:load_account, Billing.Steps.LoadAccount)
step(:load_invoice, Billing.Steps.LoadInvoice)
step(:prepare_notification, Billing.Steps.PrepareNotification,
after: [:load_account, :load_invoice]
)Choose dependency-based steps when you want to model prerequisites and joins.
They can still express a sequential chain such as step_2 after: [:step_1] and
step_3 after: [:step_2], but if the workflow is only a straight ordered path,
transition/2 is usually the clearer fit because it states the next step
directly.
Use transition/2 when the workflow is a single ordered path and each step
chooses the next step by outcome. Use after: [...] when a step should wait
for one or more prerequisite steps, especially when multiple root steps fan in
to a join step.
In the example above, :load_account and :load_invoice are independent root
steps. Squid Mesh does not need a transition between them because neither one
depends on the other. They may be enqueued independently, and
:prepare_notification becomes runnable only after both have completed.
after: [...] makes a step runnable only after every named dependency
completes successfully. Omit the option entirely for root steps; after: [] is
not valid because it changes execution semantics without adding a dependency
edge. Dependency workflows do not mix with transition/2 in this slice.
Current dependency validation requires:
- every
after:reference names a declared step - the dependency graph is acyclic
- workflows may define multiple entry steps when dependency execution is used
after: []is rejected because it changes execution semantics without adding an edge- dependency-based workflows cannot also declare
transition/2
Current execution boundary:
- a step becomes runnable only after every dependency has completed successfully
- multiple ready root steps can be enqueued independently while later phases still respect deterministic dependency order
- the current scheduler resolves dependency readiness from persisted step history after each successful dependency step, so it is intended for small and medium graph workflows
- downstream work is only enqueued from a locked run-progression boundary, so a sibling terminal failure prevents later dispatch
Transitions
Transitions define the path through the workflow.
transition(:check_gateway_status, on: :ok, to: :notify_customer)
transition(:check_gateway_status, on: :error, to: :notify_operator)
transition(:notify_customer, on: :ok, to: :complete)Current workflow validation requires:
- at least one step
- exactly one trigger
- exactly one workflow entry step for transition-based workflows
- dependency-based workflows expose
entry_stepsplusinitial_step; the singularentry_stepisnil - transitions only use supported outcomes:
:okand:error - transitions reference known steps
- each
{from, on}pair is declared at most once
Retries And Backoff
Retry policy lives on the step that owns the work:
step(:check_gateway_status, Billing.Steps.CheckGatewayStatus,
retry: [max_attempts: 5, backoff: [type: :exponential, min: 1_000, max: 30_000]]
)Supported retry options today:
max_attemptsbackoff: [type: :exponential, min: ..., max: ...]
Squid Mesh resolves workflow retry policy and uses Oban to schedule the next
step attempt. If a step also declares an on: :error transition, Squid Mesh
takes that route only after retries are exhausted.
Starting Runs
If a workflow defines a single trigger, the short path is:
SquidMesh.start_run(Billing.Workflows.PaymentRecovery, %{
account_id: account_id,
invoice_id: invoice_id,
attempt_id: attempt_id,
gateway_url: gateway_url
})If you want to name the trigger explicitly:
SquidMesh.start_run(Billing.Workflows.PaymentRecovery, :payment_recovery, %{
account_id: account_id,
invoice_id: invoice_id,
attempt_id: attempt_id,
gateway_url: gateway_url
})Current Boundaries
The current workflow contract is intentionally smaller than a full graph engine.
Supported today:
- one trigger per workflow
- sequential transitions with explicit
:okand:erroroutcomes - dependency-based joins with
after: [...] - durable retries and replay
- built-in
:wait,:log,:pause, and:approvalsteps
Not implemented today:
- parallel dispatch of multiple ready steps
- conditional branching beyond transition outcomes
- dynamic cron registration after boot
- custom reclaim logic for interrupted in-flight step ownership