Space-efficient distinct counting for the BEAM, ported from Ertl 2024 (VLDB).
UltraLogLog is a probabilistic data structure for approximate distinct counting — same constant memory, constant-time inserts, and associative merge as HyperLogLog, but 24–28% less memory at the same accuracy. This package is a paper-faithful Elixir port, cross-validated bit-for-bit against the Hash4j Java reference (v0.17.0) on every estimator.
The algorithm comes from:
Otmar Ertl. UltraLogLog: A Practical and More Space-Efficient Alternative to HyperLogLog for Approximate Distinct Counting. PVLDB 17(7), 2024. [VLDB PDF]]paper · [[arXiv extended]
Quick start
Add to mix.exs:
def deps do
[{:ultra_log_log, "~> 0.1.0"}]
endCount distinct values in a stream:
ull = UltraLogLog.new(precision: 12) # 4 KB, ~1.2% standard error
ull = UltraLogLog.add(ull, "session-abc")
ull = UltraLogLog.add(ull, "session-xyz")
{:ok, count} = UltraLogLog.cardinality(ull)
# count ≈ 2.0Merge two sketches — merge/2 is commutative, associative, and idempotent:
a = UltraLogLog.new(precision: 12) |> UltraLogLog.add("x")
b = UltraLogLog.new(precision: 12) |> UltraLogLog.add("y")
merged = UltraLogLog.merge(a, b)
{:ok, count} = UltraLogLog.cardinality(merged)
# count ≈ 2.0Trade memory for accuracy by raising the precision:
small = UltraLogLog.new(precision: 10) # 1 KB, ~3.1% error
big = UltraLogLog.new(precision: 14) # 16 KB, ~0.6% errorWhy UltraLogLog
HyperLogLog has been the standard answer for "how many distinct things have I seen?" since 2007: constant memory, constant-time inserts, and mergeable across shards or nodes. UltraLogLog keeps all of that.
What UltraLogLog adds is information density. Where HLL packs 6-bit registers, ULL uses byte-aligned 8-bit ones — two extra bits per slot, recovered many times over by a 2024 estimator family that extracts more signal from each register. The net is 24–28% less memory at the same standard error, depending on which estimator you choose. The byte alignment is also a BEAM win: registers map directly to plain binaries, no bit-packing on the hot path.
When not to use it: small N (just use a MapSet), or any case that
requires exact counts. ULL is an approximate counter; the smallest
useful precision (p=10, 1 KB) carries ~3.1% relative standard error.
Estimators
| Estimator | Storage factor | Rel. std. error | Use when |
|---|---|---|---|
:fgra (default) | 4.895 | 0.782/√m | Default. Single-pass, no iteration. |
:mle | 4.631 | 0.761/√m | Tightest bound; secant solver runs ~5 iterations per query. |
:martingale | 3.466 | 0.658/√m | Single-stream sketch never merged; returns {:error, :invalidated_by_merge} after merge/2. |
{:ok, count} = UltraLogLog.cardinality(ull, estimator: :mle)Merge is a CRDT operation. Element-wise register merge under the ULL partial order is commutative, associative, and idempotent — so distributed cardinality is trivial: shards independently maintain sketches, merge on demand, and the answer is exactly as if every insert had hit a single sketch. No coordinator, no quorum, no consensus.
Empirical validation
Every estimator is cross-checked against Hash4j v0.17.0's reference
implementation on the same 16 register snapshots (4 precisions ×
4 checkpoints), then exercised statistically over 450 random trials.
Full reports live under
docs/measurements/
in the repository.
FGRA vs Hash4j (16 fixtures)
- max relative error: 8.4e-16
- mean: 2.6e-16
This is IEEE 754 noise — the implementations agree to the last bit of double precision.
MLE vs Hash4j (16 fixtures)
- max relative error: 1.3e-16
- mean: 8.4e-18
- secant iterations: mean 4.06, max 6
Most fixtures bit-identical; the worst case is one trailing-bit flip in floating-point accumulation. The secant solver converges in 3–6 iterations on every fixture and across 100 additional random sketches per precision (300 total).
Martingale vs Hash4j (16 fixtures)
- max relative error: 0.0
- mean: 0.0
Bit-exact across all 16 fixtures, including the 100k-insert accumulation cases. The estimator shares Hash4j's branch-free integer formulation for the per-register state-change probability, so floating-point divergence has nowhere to come from.
Statistical correctness (15 cells × 30 trials, 450 estimates each)
All three estimators meet the paper's theoretical bounds with significant headroom on every (p, N) cell:
| Estimator | Worst bias | Bound | Worst stddev ratio | Bound |
|---|---|---|---|---|
:fgra | +0.411% (p=10, N=10⁴) | ±1.339% | 1.134 (p=14, N=10⁵) | 1.5 |
:mle | +0.404% (p=10, N=10⁶) | ±1.302% | 1.034 (p=14, N=10⁵) | 1.5 |
:martingale | +0.566% (p=10, N=10⁶) | ±1.127% | 1.070 (p=14, N=100) | 1.5 |
Bias bounds are 3σ around the theoretical relative standard error; stddev bounds allow up to 50% above the theoretical figure. Run the suite locally with:
REPORT=1 mix test --include statistical
See fgra-v0.1.txt, mle-v0.1.txt, and
martingale-v0.1.txt in the repository for the full
per-cell tables.
Precision and memory
Precision p allocates 2^p 8-bit registers — state size is exactly
2^p bytes:
p=10 → 1 KB, ~3.1% error
p=12 → 4 KB, ~1.2% error (default)
p=14 → 16 KB, ~0.6% error
p=16 → 64 KB, ~0.3% errorPick the smallest precision whose error fits your use case. p=12 is a
reasonable default.
Status and roadmap
- v0.1 (current) — immutable sketch, FGRA / MLE / martingale estimators, merge, binary serialization, downsize (full implementation in v0.2), full validation against Hash4j v0.17.0.
- v0.2 (planned) — lock-free
:atomics-backed concurrent insert path; native 64-bit hash (xxhash3 NIF); benchmarks; GitHub Actions CI. - v0.3 (planned) — sharded inserts via
PartitionSupervisorand cluster-wide merge over distributed Erlang. - v0.4 (potential) — ExaLogLog, the 2024 follow-up to ULL for exa-scale cardinalities.
Planned items are not promised timelines. Watch the repository or
CHANGELOG.md for releases.
Citation
If you use UltraLogLog in academic work, please cite the underlying paper:
@article{ertl2024ultraloglog,
author = {Otmar Ertl},
title = {UltraLogLog: A Practical and More Space-Efficient
Alternative to HyperLogLog for Approximate Distinct Counting},
journal = {Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment},
volume = {17},
number = {7},
year = {2024},
pages = {1655--1668},
url = {https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol17/p1655-ertl.pdf}
}If this package is useful in your production work, a star on the GitHub repository is appreciated.
Acknowledgements
- Otmar Ertl (@oertl) and Dynatrace Research for both the paper and the Hash4j Java reference, which served as ground truth for every byte of register encoding and every digit of estimator output.
- The Hash4j contributors at Dynatrace — their public source is what made paper-faithful porting realistic on a reasonable timeline.